+1

haven't looked at the code directly involved, but sounds good. At least it's 
definitely worth a try.

LieGrue,
strub

--- Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010:

> Von: Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>
> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
> An: [email protected]
> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr
> Hi all guys,
> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd
> like to
> discuss with you all:
> 
> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I
> wonder why we
> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
> dependencies)
> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff.
> What do you think about it?
> 
> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and
> XStream
> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML,
> wouldn't more
> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of
> dependencies,
> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big
> dependency
> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
> dependencies)....
> 
> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for
> your reply :)
> All the best!
> Simo
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen 
Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to