Hi all,
I propose to move non-jsr303 features to separate modules, as "user"
I'd like to download the core module (with a limited number of
dependencies) as the jsr303 implementation, then every add-on is more
than welcome!!!
Just my 2 cents :P
All the best,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/



On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Roman Stumm <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> good point. one dependency to a XML framework is enough. we can keep JAXB
> (which is part of the JDK anyway) or use the Apache Digester, which I
> haven't used yet.
> XStream is only required for the non-jsr303 parts. We can remove some code
> in this area (e.g. dependencies to freemarker, xstream) or do we want to
> keep these non-jsr303 functionality?
>
> Roman
>
>> --- Simone Tripodi<[email protected]>  schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Von: Simone Tripodi<[email protected]>
>>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
>>> An: [email protected]
>>> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd
>>> like to
>>> discuss with you all:
>>>
>>> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I
>>> wonder why we
>>> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>>> dependencies)
>>> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff.
>>> What do you think about it?
>>>
>>> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and
>>> XStream
>>> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML,
>>> wouldn't more
>>> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of
>>> dependencies,
>>> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big
>>> dependency
>>> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>>> dependencies)....
>>>
>>> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for
>>> your reply :)
>>> All the best!
>>> Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz
>> gegen Massenmails.
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>
>

Reply via email to