I would slightly reword that to - jsr303 spec requirements + spi + supporting core code
There is some code in bval-core that is required and some that can be refactored or maybe even removed. -Donald On 3/29/10 10:07 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > +1 that the core only contains jsr 303 + our spi > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > 2010/3/29 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > >> Hi all, >> I propose to move non-jsr303 features to separate modules, as "user" >> I'd like to download the core module (with a limited number of >> dependencies) as the jsr303 implementation, then every add-on is more >> than welcome!!! >> Just my 2 cents :P >> All the best, >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Roman Stumm <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> good point. one dependency to a XML framework is enough. we can keep JAXB >>> (which is part of the JDK anyway) or use the Apache Digester, which I >>> haven't used yet. >>> XStream is only required for the non-jsr303 parts. We can remove some >> code >>> in this area (e.g. dependencies to freemarker, xstream) or do we want to >>> keep these non-jsr303 functionality? >>> >>> Roman >>> >>>> --- Simone Tripodi<[email protected]> schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Von: Simone Tripodi<[email protected]> >>>>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities >>>>> An: [email protected] >>>>> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr >>>>> Hi all guys, >>>>> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd >>>>> like to >>>>> discuss with you all: >>>>> >>>>> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I >>>>> wonder why we >>>>> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the >>>>> dependencies) >>>>> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff. >>>>> What do you think about it? >>>>> >>>>> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and >>>>> XStream >>>>> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML, >>>>> wouldn't more >>>>> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of >>>>> dependencies, >>>>> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big >>>>> dependency >>>>> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the >>>>> dependencies).... >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for >>>>> your reply :) >>>>> All the best! >>>>> Simo >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________ >>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>>> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz >>>> gegen Massenmails. >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>>> >>> >>> >> >
