+1 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 that the core only contains jsr 303 + our spi > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > 2010/3/29 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > >> Hi all, >> I propose to move non-jsr303 features to separate modules, as "user" >> I'd like to download the core module (with a limited number of >> dependencies) as the jsr303 implementation, then every add-on is more >> than welcome!!! >> Just my 2 cents :P >> All the best, >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Roman Stumm <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > good point. one dependency to a XML framework is enough. we can keep JAXB >> > (which is part of the JDK anyway) or use the Apache Digester, which I >> > haven't used yet. >> > XStream is only required for the non-jsr303 parts. We can remove some >> code >> > in this area (e.g. dependencies to freemarker, xstream) or do we want to >> > keep these non-jsr303 functionality? >> > >> > Roman >> > >> >> --- Simone Tripodi<[email protected]> schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010: >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Von: Simone Tripodi<[email protected]> >> >>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities >> >>> An: [email protected] >> >>> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr >> >>> Hi all guys, >> >>> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd >> >>> like to >> >>> discuss with you all: >> >>> >> >>> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I >> >>> wonder why we >> >>> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the >> >>> dependencies) >> >>> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff. >> >>> What do you think about it? >> >>> >> >>> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and >> >>> XStream >> >>> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML, >> >>> wouldn't more >> >>> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of >> >>> dependencies, >> >>> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big >> >>> dependency >> >>> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the >> >>> dependencies).... >> >>> >> >>> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for >> >>> your reply :) >> >>> All the best! >> >>> Simo >> >>> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> >> Do You Yahoo!? >> >> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz >> >> gegen Massenmails. >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> > >> > >> >
-- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
