Hi Mark,
thanks for your feedback, if you agree I could try to start working on
at least the number 1, for the # 2 I need more investigation :P
Alles gute!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/



On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> haven't looked at the code directly involved, but sounds good. At least it's 
> definitely worth a try.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010:
>
>> Von: Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>
>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
>> An: [email protected]
>> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr
>> Hi all guys,
>> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd
>> like to
>> discuss with you all:
>>
>> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I
>> wonder why we
>> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>> dependencies)
>> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff.
>> What do you think about it?
>>
>> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and
>> XStream
>> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML,
>> wouldn't more
>> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of
>> dependencies,
>> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big
>> dependency
>> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>> dependencies)....
>>
>> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for
>> your reply :)
>> All the best!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz 
> gegen Massenmails.
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Reply via email to