WIth my best reguard. On Jan 12, 1:30 pm, Neak Kampuchea <[email protected]> wrote: > Kangaroo, You said "any inhabitant of Cambodia may or may not be > Cambodian" is really confused as you are writing English with Khmer > stanslation thinking. I do not want to say anything else, until you > check the English word "inhabitant of Cambodia" first, and tell me > before we continue discussing further. > From Neak Kampuchea. > > On Jan 11, 5:04 pm, Neak Kampuchea <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 11, 12:01 pm, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 10, 3:58 pm, Neak Kampuchea <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, but all Khmer inhabitant of Vietnam and Thailand are not > > > > Cambodian as long as Cambodian goverment did not give them Cambodian > > > > citizen status aren't they? > > > > It looks like that you are getting it a little bit at a time. > > > > >So all those Khmer are not automatically > > > > Cambodian. This is the reason that I said Khmer is not the same as > > > > Cambodian in English. And this is the big confusion in the Khmer > > > > language itself. > > > > Now, you are going back to the words again. > > > It doesn't matter which word you use, they are only citizen of > > > Cambodia as long as the Cambodian government has granted them the > > > citizenship. > > > There is no confusion. You are confused yourself because you are > > > concentrating on the words instead of the logic matter itself. > > > Any inhabitants in Cambodia may or may not be citizens of Cambodia. > > > Look at your sentence above as this: "Any inhabibants in Cambodia may > > or may not be citizens of Cambodia" > > > Kangaroo, I think you need to check on word " inhabitants" and also > > the meaning of Universal human rights provisions of Paris accord > > agreement first, before you and I could continue discussion again. > > > With my best regard from Neak Kampuchea. > > > > > Look, each language must be the core of culture of one nation. If once > > > > declares that Khmer culture heritage foundation is self-evaluated as > > > > highly than other, Khmer empire should not be broken and become > > > > smaller and smaller than its neighbors. > > > > No, the language is not the core of one nation. Look at America. There > > > are alot of languages used by the American people. The principle of > > > the constitution is the core of America. The principle of Cambodia is > > > the core of Cambodia. Unfortunately, Cambodians have very little of > > > that. > > > > > We should understand what means one nation's culture, which is the way > > > > of live of its people such as the way they educate their children, the > > > > way they play and listen music, the way they build their country, the > > > > way they do businesses and technology, etc.. > > > > One part of the Cambodian culture is to fight each other for their own > > > rightiousness. > > > One part of the Cambodian culture is to corrupt so they can practice a > > > culture of impunity over no one but their own people. > > > And many more..... > > > > > Kankaroo, please tell me why Cambodian needs English or France for > > > > doing better education, if Khmer culture is so highly valuable than > > > > others? I think It should be barbarian! > > > > No, Cambodians don't need English or France to advance their own > > > country. > > > Actually, no English nor Frech will ever help Cambodians. > > > Cambodians must help themselves if they want to advance their own > > > nation. One of the things that they need to do is to cooperate instead > > > of fighting each other. As you have seen, they have current government > > > and an opposition who would oppose anything and everything that the > > > current government is doing. Please tell me how they can achieve peace > > > and prosperity among themselves. Look back at the Cambodian history. > > > How many factions have they been fighting each other for power? > > > How many times have you seen them changed faction? > > > This is a serious part of the Cambodian past. They must look at it. > > > Sam Rainsy and his clans need to look at it. Their action has not been > > > improving the lives of Cambodia. Actually, they have been creating one > > > of the same that they have had for many decades. That's what I am > > > talking about. Sam Rainsy is hiding behind what so called democracy. > > > Democracy will not be achieved if the act of doing it is to fight > > > another part of the country.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
