I must agree that the obfuscation is really impressive (specially in a presentation where you can include the full source on one slide). I just don't like to touch it. And unfortunately it doesn't evolve by itself.
I'm just tired of renaming camping-unabridged.rb to camping.rb in order to test the apps, and then back again when I commit stuff. I'll be perfectly fine if someone else creates the obfuscated version :-) On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:50 PM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 07:27:18AM +1930, Aníbal Rojas wrote: >> > === >> > 4. Renaming camping-unabridged.rb to camping.rb? >> > === >> > >> > I haven't touched camping.rb at all, do we really need to prove that it's a >> > micro-framework? It just makes development/releasing harder. Let's just >> > forget >> > about the abridged version and rename camping-unabridged.rb to camping.rb! >> >> Keeping Camping away from the bloat goes far beyond an arbitrary weight >> limit. >> It is a nice way to promote Camping. It is catchy saying "In Less then >> 4K", period. > > Instead of saying the obfuscation "just makes development/releasing harder," > try saying obfuscation "just makes flippancy/esotericism easier." > > _why > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > Camping-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > -- Magnus Holm _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
