I agree. The obfuscation could probably be automated somehow with ParseTree and ruby2ruby...I'm not entirely sure. It'd be fun to toy with though.
--Jeremy On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Manfred Stienstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 22, 2008, at 8:01 PM, Magnus Holm wrote: > >> I must agree that the obfuscation is really impressive (specially in a >> presentation where you can include the full source on one slide). I just >> don't like >> to touch it. > > I personally think that the esthetic properties of obfuscated source is what > attracts quite a few people to the framework. I would really like to see it > maintained as the primary distribution format. > > Manfred > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > Camping-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > -- http://jeremymcanally.com/ http://entp.com Read my books: Ruby in Practice (http://manning.com/mcanally/) My free Ruby e-book (http://humblelittlerubybook.com/) Or, my blogs: http://mrneighborly.com http://rubyinpractice.com _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
