In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sue Burchett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>>I am not a continuous cruiser but if I was, having read the comments in
>>this thread which have consisted of some half remembered conversation of
>>30 years ago which doesn't appear to have ever been documented, an act
>>of parliament that failed to specify exactly how far a boat had to move
>>between mooring places and the almost total lack of any supervision
>>actually taking place, I feel that I could cruise and stop just about
>>anywhere I damn well chose and BW wouldn't have a leg to stand on if
>>they tried to enforce their 'rules' in court.
>>
>>BW seem better at FUD than even Microsoft. ;-)
>>
>> Bob
>>--
>> Bob Adams - email: bob55 at ntlworld dot com
>
>The trouble is BW have no intention of going to court. If they think you are
>not obeying their rules they will refuse to issue a licence.
Surely then, the person who has been refused a licence takes BW to
court?
Bob
--
Bob Adams - email: bob55 at ntlworld dot com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
