Steve Wood wrote " ... I do believe that BW is a national asset and
belongs in the public sector. "

Hear hear! It must remain being funded in some way by Central Govt. as
that is the only way it gets a contribution towards upkeep from all
those users that do not pay BW directly for their use of the system. I
am talking about walkers, painters, runners, cyclists, neighbours and
anyone else whose derives pleasure from our canals and rivers without
paying a direct charge for doing so. Why should an asset that is used by
so many be funded by a limited selection of system users only?

Graham
nb firsthandexperienceofmidyearbudgetclawbacksandhowtheyscrewupplans
www.jannock.org.uk


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

              • ... Will Chapman
              • ... Susan Burchett
              • ... Will Chapman
              • ... Niall
              • ... sentto-11600569-25813-1161543148-archive=mail-archive . com
              • ... Steve Haywood
              • ... Will Chapman
        • R... Martin
          • ... Neil Arlidge
            • ... Adrian Stott
  • RE: [canals-li... Keens, Graham, VF UK - Technology \(MP\)
  • Re: [canals-li... Arthurnaylor2802

Reply via email to