Steve Haywood wrote:
> On 21/10/06, Adrian Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ":
>>>> Where do you get this information about Conservative policy, Adrian?
>> Can you
>>>>  source it for me?
>> Sorry.  It was told to me in confidence.
>>
>>>>  I have been told by Central Office as recently as last week that the
>> policy
>>>>  derived from the James Committee was still official policy, though as
>> I
>>>>  understand it, responsibilty for examining the waterways lies with
>> John
>>>>  Gummer's Quality of Life Commission, part of Cameron's policy review
>>>>  process. You seem to be suggesting that this has reached some
>> conclusion
>>>>  that has been publicised.
>> I believe no change has been publicised.
> 
> 
> I have done considerable work on this since Adrian's reply and I have to
> conclude that whatever his sources, mine - more than one, well placed and
> impeccable - are telling me a very different story. I understand there is
> considerable push from within certain sectors of the Conservative party
> to change the financial status of BW. Discussion has so far ranged from
> privatisation options to complete financial restructuring. However, no
> policy has been finalised. As I said in my posting above, responsibility for
> formulating policy on the waterways lies in the first instance with John
> Gummer's Quality of Life committee, one of a number that Cameron has
> instigated.
> 
> This is scheduled to report 'sometime next year' - his office can't/won't
> tell me when - and is currently taking submissions at
> www.qualityoflifechallenge.com
> 
> I think it would be worthwhile peppering this site with suggestions; I shall
> certainly be making a submission myself. It seems to me this is a way of
> effecting Conservative policy before it gets entrenched along traditional
> lines. A significant response would let the party know there are potential
> votes in this issue, and some of the suggestions that people have made might
> even get them thinking outside of the box - which is what Cameron says he
> wants. What about a SOW submission? What about using the website to
> encourage individuals to make representations, Mike?
> 

Steve

I think this is an excellent idea. There appear to be several
categories where we could post. I'll start the ball rolling
lets see if that encourages others to follw.

Cheers



-- 



Will Chapman
Save Our Waterways
www.SaveOurWaterways.org.uk



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

            • ... Adrian Stott
              • ... Captain Beeky
              • ... Adrian Stott
              • ... Captain Beeky
              • ... Will Chapman
              • ... Susan Burchett
              • ... Will Chapman
              • ... Niall
              • ... sentto-11600569-25813-1161543148-archive=mail-archive . com
              • ... Steve Haywood
              • ... Will Chapman
        • R... Martin
          • ... Neil Arlidge
            • ... Adrian Stott
  • RE: [canals-li... Keens, Graham, VF UK - Technology \(MP\)
  • Re: [canals-li... Arthurnaylor2802

Reply via email to