> --- In [email protected], "Bru Peckett" <bruce@> wrote: > > ***********I WASN'T AT HOME!*** > > ************* A TOTALLY UNJUSTFIED COMMENT SEEING THAT YOU WERE NOT > THERE TO SEE THE ARRANGEMENT *** > > ************RUBBISH - THE PAINT WAS IN THE WATER THAT WAS HEATED UP. > THERE WAS NO EXPOSED FLAMES OR SPARKS EVEN IF SOME OF THE SOLVENT WAS > EVAPORATING. I SHOULD HAVE MADE IT CLEAR THAT IT WAS THE WATER THAT > WAS VERY HOT GIVING OFF WISPS OF STEAM? AND THE PAINT WAS BEING > MONITORED DURING THE HEATING PROCESS, UNTIL IT WAS *RIGHT* *** > > ************YES I WAS WEARING A MASK AND WAS PROTECTED FROM OVERSPRAY > FROM HEAD TO FOOT, ESPECIALLY MY HAIR!*** > > > ************ FORTUNATELY MY STEELWORK HOLDS UP VERY WELL WITH A HIGH > GLOSS FINISH*** THE PURPOSE MADE SHELL WAS A SUPERB JOB*** > > ************* WHAT ABOUT THE INSECTS THEN? *** >
> > ************** A COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ADAPTOR IS NOT (AS FAR AS I > KNOW) AVAILABLE. THE CONVERSION WAS WITH BRASS FITTING REDUCERS > BETWEEN THE BAYONET ROAD DRILL FITTING AND THE SNAP-ON AIR LINE > FITTING. I DISAGREE THAT THERE WAS ANY POSSIBLE DANGER. THE ROAD > COMPRESSOR WAS REGULATED AT 114PSI. IT WAS THE VOLUME OF AIR > AVAILABLE THAT WAS IMPORTANT*** > > > ************ AIRLINE SPRAYING PRESSURE WAS AROUND 70PSI AS FAR AS I > CAN REMEMBER AND FINE TUNED WITH THE GUN ADJUSTMENTS *** > > > ***********NO ONE WOULD EVEN CONSIDER THE MADE UP FITTING *A BODGE* > IN FACT IT WAS VERY PROFFESSIONAL USING CORRECT BRASS AIR LINE > FITTINGS!*** Can I point out to Bruce that capital (uppercase) emails are the internet equivalent of SHOUTING. When I read posts on this Newsgroup I'm more than happy for the contributors to engage in a lively debate but I DON'T LIKE BEING SHOUTED AT! Les Hunt
