> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Cazaly
> Hi Bruce! > I thank you for the very detailed reply. (I clipped it all out as I > didn't want to have pages of text). It can be refered to though! Eek! You mean people actually read this stuff????? > Your knowledge and experience far surpasses mine. Had I had your > expertise under my belt, I would probably not have taken the > course of > action I did. > In hind site, I consider myself very lucky that there wasn't > a mishap. I think you covered the subject admirably and I > can't add anyhing to > it, only that other people may be unwise to try and spray > *hot* Too right! :-) Advice from craftsmen from any trade who've been around a long time is always worth looking at sideways - there were a truly terrifying array of dodgy practices, potentially lethal tricks of the trade and iffy work-arounds in construction, engineering and similar trades in the days before Health & Safety became a big issue. Most often, such suspect methods were ways of doing the job quicker rather than better (piecework, aaagggghhh! I know, said a bean counter, lets pay people more to work faster. Never seemed to occur to 'em that *faster* and *better* are not one and the same thing). Sometimes, in all fairness, it was simply that nobody knew any better at the time. > PS: The poor little insects leaving their feet behind! Well, it's their own stupid fault for landing on tacky paint innit! Bru
