Trevor B wrote . . > Which goes back to Julian's comment about it being capable > of receiving and Staffy has admitted to using it.
When did he do that ? To my knowledge Staffy has never used this equipment for anything other than watching commercial non pirate DVDs. If there is a way to receive a TV signal at Staffy's place, using the equipment in the house, he doesn't know how to do it and it has never been done. I am writing up the notes on this matter for the inevitable future reference, when the time comes. I maintain the view that regardless of the facts, the TV licence chasers assume that all properties without licences are evading the purchase of one. Perhaps quite a reasonable assumption if a TV set is present on the premises - but nevertheless incorrect at this location. Let's face it Staffy invited the inspector in to see that a non functioning set was present. The inspector was only interested in the fact that a set was present, functioning or not. I don't think Staffy is crazy, and neither does he ! Beeky
