"Richard Tanner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I am considering fitting a new alternator to my Beta B43 engine, 175 amp in 
>place of the 95 amp fitted. This is now being fitted by Beta as standard. The 
>idea being that it should reduce the running time needed to charge the 
>batteries when I am moored up for a period of time.

A higher-amperage alternator will enable you to charge your battery
more quickly, provided you have a regulator smart enough to set the
output voltage correctly throughout the charging cycle.

Some years ago, I replaced the standard alternator on my propulsion
engine with a 100 A 24 V one.  I also did something else, though,
which I suggest you consider.  I replaced the crankshaft pulley with a
much larger one, giving a 4:1 ratio between the crankshaft and the
alternator.  This means that the alternator spins fast enough to give
a significant output at just above idle.  The engine is rated to
2,500/minute, but that's fine as the alternator is rated to
12,000/minute.  Actually, I very seldom rev the engine over about
1,700/minute.

To drive the larger alternator, especially at the larger ratio, I use
a poly-V belt.  These are much more effective than multiple single V
belts.  Pulleys for them are readily available, as are belts of many
lengths.  These belts tend not to slip, and last a very long time.
They aren't expensive.

My current installation normally recharges my battery fully after only
an hour or two of cruising.  Very worthwhile.

Adrian

.

Adrian Stott
07956-299966

Reply via email to