Steve Haywood wrote: > 2008/9/29 rb999sb [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> Continuous cruisers and continuous moorers are two separate species >> and should be treated as such. Altering the charges for one to >> control the other is ridiculous. >> Sue > > > This pithy contribution hits the nail on the head. > > Over ensuing months continuous moorers will be demonised, part of BW's > campaign to raise additional revenue from continuous cruisers. > > What they are doing though, is charging for something most of us believe we > pay for already in our license. If we don't resist, take it from me that > this will be just the start of it and there will be a whole host of charges > levied on things we already think we pay for. > > BW have already established a precedent at Llangollen. Maybe charges for > overnight moorings will be seen as the next milch cow?
I think the precedent was established with the end-of-garden moorings. Just *what* is someone using when mooring at the end of their garden that they aren't when on the 24 hour moorings at Shardlow?
