----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 12:14 PM Subject: [canals-list] Re: Re: WW vote on CC (XP)
> > "Steve Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> 2008/12/2 Adrian Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> "Steve Haywood" >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >Adrian, I have heard a rumour that at the same time you were writing in >>> the >>> >waterways press and arguing on this list in favour of the moorings >>> >auction >>> >that you were in discussions with BW about running the scheme. Is that >>> true? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> After BW decided to pilot bidding for moorings, it advertised for >>> contractors to build the tenders part of the BW web site. In >>> response, my business put in a proposal to build an external moorings >>> auction (or tender) site at our risk and expense, on which BW could >>> post its vacancies on a flat-fee-per-mooring-advertised basis. >>> >>> Don't you think then that you had some sort of duty to declare an >>> interest >> to us on this list and maybe even to the readers of the magazines for >> which >> you wrote that you had a financial interest in the outcome of this >> debate? > > Don't you think that you should have left Adrian's post intact especially > the bit where Adrian said he had declared his interest at the time. > Rather than use selective snipping just to score points. > > J > Come on J - you should know better! That would have meant treating Adrian's contributions fairly and rationally :-)} Guy -- Guy Morgan First Light Services nb Virgo, WFB, Stockton, GU
