"Steve Haywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2008/12/2 Adrian Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> "Steve Haywood" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >Adrian, I have heard a rumour that at the same time you were writing in >> the >> >waterways press and arguing on this list in favour of the moorings >> >auction >> >that you were in discussions with BW about running the scheme. Is that >> true? >> >> Yes. >> >> After BW decided to pilot bidding for moorings, it advertised for >> contractors to build the tenders part of the BW web site. In >> response, my business put in a proposal to build an external moorings >> auction (or tender) site at our risk and expense, on which BW could >> post its vacancies on a flat-fee-per-mooring-advertised basis. >> >> Don't you think then that you had some sort of duty to declare an >> interest > to us on this list and maybe even to the readers of the magazines for > which > you wrote that you had a financial interest in the outcome of this debate?
Don't you think that you should have left Adrian's post intact especially the bit where Adrian said he had declared his interest at the time. Rather than use selective snipping just to score points. J
