On 2/26/09 2:18 PM, Lee Hambley wrote: > Hey Jamis, > > I never actually bothered to check, I figured it was served from the > github gem server -- completely agree with your last statement about > people not really taking much interest in hacking the core before, > there's no reason that people should go messing with it for no real > reason now... > > My only concern would be that there is no more single place to go to get > a copy, get info and learn about it, a bunch of similarly named forks, > with similar feature sets would just cause trouble :)
The only reason people look to "/jamis/capistrano" as the canonical copy is because that's what's been linked to in the past. As soon as another repo because the "canonical" one (whatever that means), it becomes a documentation issue. There's really nothing especially discoverable about "/jamis/capistrano", and there are already a LOT of capistrano forks on github, and it never really caused trouble before. :) - Jamis --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
