Hi Dr. Antas, this is a very positive reference and it shows that -at least conceptually- Care2x is on the right way.
> As we can see... Godert and its German site rules the way... It is very clear, that Godert has excellent, worldwide contacts and is able to trigger interest on Care2x from many different parties. Though not being a real developer himself, he is a very entusiastic user and promoter of high-potential software solutions. I really think, his most promising role in the Care2x community would be in the marketing field and management of network communications. Very often he also crosses borders and breaks rules, very rarely (I would say never) he does so to blame someone personally or to sabotage the projekt. We must admit, that some of his statements have not been very fruitful for bringing the projekt forward. But we can also say, that many of his hints and comments were very useful. > For how long will Care2x continue to be a "one-man-band" project? May be the case Godert exemplifies the situation of the ongoing development of the projekt: Everyone does everything, not really asking or telling the other members what he is actually doing. So the development follows a lot of different pathes, which we do not know about in detail and cannot tell where/when they will integrate into the official release. My proposals: 1. We should agree about prioritary aims of development 2. We should setup different working groups aech for one of the defined aims 3. We should use a more structured way of communication (i.e. moderated discussion board) 4. We should develop valid business and financing models all around Care2x 5. Formation of a "Scientific advisory board for Care2x" is a must. I am fully with you. (There may also be much more important proposals...This is what I tell spontanously) Thanks for your attention ! A. Hoelzel ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Antas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 1:11 PM Subject: [Care2002-developers] Care2x in the Imperial Cancer Research Fund (UK) owned Openclinal site > The Cancer Research UK, formerly known as the Imperial Cancer Research > Fund (ICRF) funds the site http://www.openclinical.org > > Take a look a: www.openclinical.org/prj_care2x.html > > As we can see... Godert and its German site rules the way... > > When we take a look at the "Scientific advisory board of OpenClinical" > at http://www.openclinical.org/scientific_board.html, we know that > medical care applications have special credibility problems and > sometimes an "advisory board" with a few Dr.'s helps the way to the top... > > For how long will Care2x continue to be a "one-man-band" project? > > J. Antas > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Care2002-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
