Hi Dr. H�lzel, hi Alex :-) > Hi Dr. Antas, > > this is a very positive reference and it shows that -at least conceptually- > Care2x is on the right way. > >> As we can see... Godert and its German site rules the way... > It is very clear, that Godert has excellent, worldwide contacts and is able > to trigger interest on Care2x from many different parties.
Thanks for this honor :-) > Though not being > a real developer himself, he is a very entusiastic user and promoter of > high-potential software solutions. I really think, his most promising role > in the Care2x community would be in the marketing field and management of > network communications. I never claimed for other things. I still prepare a P2P and P3P network. DynDNS based :-) But my time to work for the project is more limited as one year before. > Very often he also crosses borders and breaks rules, Ok i am polarize. I do it with some special stile, which is most effective. But not everyone likes it. I be aware about it. > very rarely (I would say never) he does so to blame someone personally or to > sabotage the projekt. We must admit, that some of his statements have not > been very fruitful for bringing the projekt forward. But we can also say, > that many of his hints and comments were very useful. It's a question of strategy and the view of point. I am a human being and do mistakes as well. It's not my position at the moment to comment why. > >> For how long will Care2x continue to be a "one-man-band" project? > May be the case Godert exemplifies the situation of the ongoing development > of the projekt: Everyone does everything, not really asking or telling the > other members what he is actually doing. So the development follows a lot of > different pathes, which we do not know about in detail and cannot tell > where/when they will integrate into the official release. Be aware, that i was excluded and not in the position to go another way. Care2x.de have nothing to do with the care2x project. This is Elpidios decision. But absolute its not a fork! > > My proposals: > 1. We should agree about prioritary aims of development > 2. We should setup different working groups aech for one of the defined aims > 3. We should use a more structured way of communication (i.e. moderated > discussion board) > 4. We should develop valid business and financing models all around Care2x > 5. Formation of a "Scientific advisory board for Care2x" is a must. I am > fully with you. > (There may also be much more important proposals...This is what I tell > spontanously) Hmmm give all a little bit more time. Some things clear itself. As far as i see Elpidio tries to provocate the developers at the moment. From an experienced Open Source leader i got yesterday this message after a review of him: Wenn Elpidio es nicht schaffen sollte, andere mit reinzulassen. Wird er es nicht mehr positiv nach vorne bringen. Es wird ab einem bestimmten Punkt Substitutionsprozesse geben. Das kann ein Fork sein, oder eine Gruppe macht komplett alleine weiter und Elpidio ist raus. I try the translation: If Elpidio manage all allone and to let others not come in. The project will not go straight forward in a positive way. There will be a point that it comes to a substitution process. This can be a fork or a group goes straight forward completely allone and Elpidio will be out. IMHO Elpidio is realy an experienced developer. He manage the project in a realy good way. But i like to remark also that he need time to come to a personal decition. The project and he needs time and the time works for the project. The points you suggest are points of personal interests. Interests of a doctors thinking. There is no need to hurry to go to action. Regards Wilfried > > Thanks for your attention ! > > A. Hoelzel > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. Antas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 1:11 PM > Subject: [Care2002-developers] Care2x in the Imperial Cancer Research Fund > (UK) owned Openclinal site > > >> The Cancer Research UK, formerly known as the Imperial Cancer Research >> Fund (ICRF) funds the site http://www.openclinical.org >> >> Take a look a: www.openclinical.org/prj_care2x.html >> >> As we can see... Godert and its German site rules the way... >> >> When we take a look at the "Scientific advisory board of OpenClinical" >> at http://www.openclinical.org/scientific_board.html, we know that >> medical care applications have special credibility problems and >> sometimes an "advisory board" with a few Dr.'s helps the way to the top... >> >> For how long will Care2x continue to be a "one-man-band" project? >> >> J. Antas >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: >> Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE >> LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Care2002-developers mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
