On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Scott Battaglia
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:23 AM, William G. Thompson, Jr.
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Scott Battaglia
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Bill,
>> > Thanks for kicking this off.  Is Spring 2012 accurate for your
>> > assessment of
>> > the 3.5 release?
>>
>> <snip />
>>
>> > If so, I'd like to consider a different version number which would allow
>> > us
>> > to incorporate some of the important architectural changes if we're
>> > pushing
>> > the release out that far.
>>
>> A major and minor release don't have to be mutually exclusive (as long
>> as there are resources to execute on them).  However, if the
>> architectural changes you have in mind are evolutionary, in terms of
>> the release strategy, shouldn't we consider them for 3.5?
>>
>
> Most of them require some level of API change from mostly non-invasive to
> completely invasive depending on the feature.  And while some are complete
> API re-writes its typically APIs that deployers don't write to unless really
> ambitious (i.e. the storage mechanisms).

OK. Sorry I think I misread your post...I thought you talking about
changes specifically for 3.5 proposals like LPPE.

Bill



> Cheers,
> Scott
>
>
>>
>> Best,
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>> > Cheers,
>> > Scott
>> >
>> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:59 PM, William G. Thompson, Jr.
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Folks,
>> >>
>> >> As discussed by the cas-steering committee and on cas-dev, I'm
>> >> endeavoring to improve the situation around the CAS Roadmap(s).  I've
>> >> started a draft of the kinds of things I think the roadmap should
>> >> communicate here:
>> >> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/~wgthom/CAS+Roadmap
>> >>
>> >> There are proposed items listed for 3.5 that are just
>> >> that...proposals.  Please only put other proposals there if you intend
>> >> to work on them.  This is not a wishlist of things you'd like someone
>> >> else to implement.  That list is over here:
>> >> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/CAS/Wishlist
>> >>
>> >> I'd very much like some feedback on the overall form of the roadmap
>> >> and on how to proceed with the process of opening up 3.5 for active
>> >> development.  If folks are happy with the format, I'll move it over to
>> >> the CAS wiki space and point the other roadmaps to it.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Bill
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>> >
>> > --
>> > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>> > [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to