I think Marvin offered to migrate the existing roadmap to this document
which would improve the accuracy of both the work he and I have committed to
(which is more than CAS4).  I'll sync up with him tomorrow during the day.

Thanks
Scott


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:29 PM, William G. Thompson, Jr.
<[email protected]>wrote:

> > No, it was just a draft in my personal space.  I've moved it over
> > here: https://wiki.jasig.org/display/CAS/CAS+Roadmap.  Everyone should
> > be able to edit it now.
>
> Scott, Andrew, Marvin,
>
> I took the liberty of putting your names on the draft based on my
> understanding of current commitments, they may of course be wrong or
> have changed.  Please review it for accuracy:
> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/CAS/CAS+Roadmap
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:22 PM, William G. Thompson, Jr.
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Marvin Addison
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> I'm trying to steer away from top-down planning towards a more
> >>> practical near-term bottom-up approach consistent with a Jasig style
> >>> of development.
> >>
> >> This comment could be considered inflammatory because it suggests that
> >> the project may presently suffer from top-down management, or that it
> >> has in the past.  Both Scott's roadmap and all development to date
> >> have happened with community collaboration and in open venues where
> >> anyone may review, comment, and participate.  This seems to me
> >> perfectly consistent with the "Jasig way," so I'm unclear on the basis
> >> of your comment.
> >
> > It would be truly regrettable if anyone took offense at my attempt to
> > explain the approach, and I hope that is not the case.  I did not
> > intend to suggest or infer anything in particular about current or
> > past efforts.  My only focus is how best to move forward together.
> >
> >
> >> I appreciate the practicality of the approach you've taken, however,
> >> where roadmap items are accepted based on available developer
> >> resources to accomplish them.  That said, as far as I'm aware Scott
> >> and I had agreed implicitly to work on all the items on
> >> https://wiki.jasig.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=28574039.
> >>
> >>> Individual developers interested in committing to work should fill it
> out
> >>> and bring discussion about intent and approach to the cas-dev list.
> >>
> >> I'm happy to approach the roadmap in this fashion, but let's not lose
> >> the vision of the roadmap I cited above.  I plan to move over items
> >> from that roadmap that I will explicitly commit to working on in a
> >> manner that is consistent with our current version numbering scheme.
> >> I think we're in agreement that the version numbers matter much less
> >> than the features within, so take the numbering with a grain of salt.
> >
> > Excellent!
> >
> >>
> >> Looks like I can't edit
> >> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/~wgthom/CAS+Roadmap.  Is that
> >> intentional, or am I missing something?
> >
> > No, it was just a draft in my personal space.  I've moved it over
> > here: https://wiki.jasig.org/display/CAS/CAS+Roadmap.  Everyone should
> > be able to edit it now.
> >
> > Best,
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> M
> >>
> >> --
> >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to