> I'm trying to steer away from top-down planning towards a more > practical near-term bottom-up approach consistent with a Jasig style > of development.
This comment could be considered inflammatory because it suggests that the project may presently suffer from top-down management, or that it has in the past. Both Scott's roadmap and all development to date have happened with community collaboration and in open venues where anyone may review, comment, and participate. This seems to me perfectly consistent with the "Jasig way," so I'm unclear on the basis of your comment. I appreciate the practicality of the approach you've taken, however, where roadmap items are accepted based on available developer resources to accomplish them. That said, as far as I'm aware Scott and I had agreed implicitly to work on all the items on https://wiki.jasig.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=28574039. > Individual developers interested in committing to work should fill it out > and bring discussion about intent and approach to the cas-dev list. I'm happy to approach the roadmap in this fashion, but let's not lose the vision of the roadmap I cited above. I plan to move over items from that roadmap that I will explicitly commit to working on in a manner that is consistent with our current version numbering scheme. I think we're in agreement that the version numbers matter much less than the features within, so take the numbering with a grain of salt. Looks like I can't edit https://wiki.jasig.org/display/~wgthom/CAS+Roadmap. Is that intentional, or am I missing something? M -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
