Well, damn. :) I guess that moves me to -0.
-Jonathan On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Zach Wily<[email protected]> wrote: > Wouldn't jira still be used for ticketing? Gerrit is solely code review. > > (As a git/gerrit fan, I would be +1 if I was actually contributing in some > way.) > > zach > > On Jun 24, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> Yesterday I posted about my git-svn workflow [1]. What I didn't >> expect was that a member of ASF infrastructure who is setting up a >> pilot project [2] based on git + gerrit [3] instead of svn + jira >> asked if we'd be interested in helping test it out. >> >> They are setting it up so it will still push changes back to svn so we >> can always go back to svn if it doesn't work out. >> >> At first I was totally enthusiastic, but then I realized that if it >> works out, we can move to it later and let someone _else_ shake out >> the bugs first. :) >> >> But if we move now then we don't have to deal with jira awfulness that >> much sooner. >> >> So I would be +0 (mildly in favor). >> >> -Jonathan >> > >
