I'm +1 for it If it makes you guys happy.
although after a year of working with git stuff I still have no clue
on how to fork properly ;-0. (I'm getting old and clueless).
On 25/06/2009, at 1:48 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Well, damn. :)
I guess that moves me to -0.
-Jonathan
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Zach Wily<[email protected]> wrote:
Wouldn't jira still be used for ticketing? Gerrit is solely code
review.
(As a git/gerrit fan, I would be +1 if I was actually contributing
in some
way.)
zach
On Jun 24, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Yesterday I posted about my git-svn workflow [1]. What I didn't
expect was that a member of ASF infrastructure who is setting up a
pilot project [2] based on git + gerrit [3] instead of svn + jira
asked if we'd be interested in helping test it out.
They are setting it up so it will still push changes back to svn
so we
can always go back to svn if it doesn't work out.
At first I was totally enthusiastic, but then I realized that if it
works out, we can move to it later and let someone _else_ shake out
the bugs first. :)
But if we move now then we don't have to deal with jira awfulness
that
much sooner.
So I would be +0 (mildly in favor).
-Jonathan
--
Ian Holsman
[email protected]
