I like git and would be happy with its use. Jira is status quo, so that's fine.
I'm not sure why gerrit is needed if Jira is going to still be used. Would there be a new process developed using some combination of gerrit and Jira be developed, or would Cassandra just get Jira and git integration? -- Jeff On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ian Holsman<i...@holsman.net> wrote: > I'm +1 for it If it makes you guys happy. > > although after a year of working with git stuff I still have no clue on how > to fork properly ;-0. (I'm getting old and clueless). > > On 25/06/2009, at 1:48 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> Well, damn. :) >> >> I guess that moves me to -0. >> >> -Jonathan >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Zach Wily<z...@zwily.com> wrote: >>> >>> Wouldn't jira still be used for ticketing? Gerrit is solely code review. >>> >>> (As a git/gerrit fan, I would be +1 if I was actually contributing in >>> some >>> way.) >>> >>> zach >>> >>> On Jun 24, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >>> >>>> Yesterday I posted about my git-svn workflow [1]. What I didn't >>>> expect was that a member of ASF infrastructure who is setting up a >>>> pilot project [2] based on git + gerrit [3] instead of svn + jira >>>> asked if we'd be interested in helping test it out. >>>> >>>> They are setting it up so it will still push changes back to svn so we >>>> can always go back to svn if it doesn't work out. >>>> >>>> At first I was totally enthusiastic, but then I realized that if it >>>> works out, we can move to it later and let someone _else_ shake out >>>> the bugs first. :) >>>> >>>> But if we move now then we don't have to deal with jira awfulness that >>>> much sooner. >>>> >>>> So I would be +0 (mildly in favor). >>>> >>>> -Jonathan >>>> >>> >>> > > -- > Ian Holsman > i...@holsman.net > > > >
