I think the extra foot in the 28 went to the step-through stern transom (there is a short step). The internal layout of the 27 looks a lot more like the 28 than the 270.

John Harker C27 #6261 'Prana' Santa Cruz

Russ Dearmore wrote:
If Catalina begins to focus on the 28' then maybe we can sleep in the V berth in the future. (Not at the same time....) Ha That and a little more head room would be nice without going to the 30.

*/Joe McCary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:

    I checked the Catalina website, they show boats in 3 categories:
    Sport 8’-25’; Cruiser 28’-35’; Ocean 38’-47’. My guess, looking at
    the size designations they might redo the 28mkII boat, the next
    larger boats are 309, 320mkII, 34MKII. It is interesting that the
    list the 320mkII then the 28mkII then the 34mkII followed by the
    309 and lastly the 350 MKII. You would think they would list them
    in order of size. Also interesting noting the designations of mkII
    vs MKII (why the change to capital letters).
    Joe McCary
    Aeolus II #4795
    West River, MD
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    *On Behalf Of *ebolean

    if true, any rumors on what will replace it, if anything at 27 ft?

    John Oppenheimer wrote:

    No kidding, very nice. But I guess not enough think so, word is, the

    C270 is being dropped from Catalina's production line.

    John




Change your thinking, change your life. We are guided, we are guarded, we are healed, we are blessed.....



Reply via email to