Those 3 drawings all together are amazing to see. I am surprised how sleek the C27 looks compared to the other 2. And of the 3 I would guess the C270 is the slowest with the C28 maybe second. Also, I thought the LOA of the C27 was 26'10" , not 27' as noted.
Joe McCary Aeolus II #4795 West River, MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Phil Agur > > Actually a C28MKII is 1.5' longer and 1.5' wider than a C27. > > Here are the interior layouts side by side and scaled to size. > http://www.catalina27.org/comps.jpg > > I took the liberty of showing the C270 V berth with its extension in place > and clarified the Captain Quarters by added pillows in the aft state room. > > I think the C270 and C28MKII are fairly comparable interior wise especially > when you start including systems. > > Exterior wise the share the same rig proportions, hull lines, and walk > through transom and Offshore CE rating. The C28 MKII is said to sail a lot > stiffer than a C270. The C28MKII spec shows only about 9.5% more sail area > but 45% more keel weight. > > Phil Agur s/v Wing Tip > Secretary/Treasurer Call Sign WCW3485 > IC27/270A MMSI 366901790 > www.catalina27.org Vessel Doc# 1039809 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Harker > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 9:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: catalina27-talk: Pictures of a new C270 > > I think the extra foot in the 28 went to the step-through stern transom > (there is a short step). The internal layout of the 27 looks a lot more > like the 28 than the 270. > > John Harker C27 #6261 'Prana' Santa Cruz > > Russ Dearmore wrote: > > If Catalina begins to focus on the 28' then maybe we can sleep in the > > V berth in the future. (Not at the same time....) Ha That and a little > > more head room would be nice without going to the 30. > > > > */Joe McCary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote: > > > > I checked the Catalina website, they show boats in 3 categories: > > Sport 8-25; Cruiser 28-35; Ocean 38-47. My guess, looking at > > the size designations they might redo the 28mkII boat, the next > > larger boats are 309, 320mkII, 34MKII. It is interesting that the > > list the 320mkII then the 28mkII then the 34mkII followed by the > > 309 and lastly the 350 MKII. You would think they would list them > > in order of size. Also interesting noting the designations of mkII > > vs MKII (why the change to capital letters). > > Joe McCary > > Aeolus II #4795 > > West River, MD > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *On Behalf Of *ebolean > > > > if true, any rumors on what will replace it, if anything at 27 ft? > > > > John Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > No kidding, very nice. But I guess not enough think so, word is, the > > > > C270 is being dropped from Catalina's production line. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > Change your thinking, change your life. We are guided, we are guarded, > > we are healed, we are blessed..... > > >
