Ok, I just tried to configure the whole thing:

   - authentication open eap + authentication network-eap
   - radius-server local on root AP
   - DHCP server on core switch behind AP
   - infrastructure-client on AP
   - WGB using dot1x profile to authenticate on root AP
   - DHCP client configured on WGB BVI1

And all works fine. I added vlans in the WGB to act as a trunk link, and I
can ping many clients behind my WGB in different vlans.

I'm sure there is a specific command interacting with the
infrastructure-client that made your association/authentication fail.
Unless the radio was buggy, and when you removed the infrastructure-client
command, if forced the radio interface to reset.


2014-02-06 Andre Aubet <[email protected]>:

> Jay,
>
> Can you share your full configuration for the two APs? I just tried myself
> to configure a WGB using infrastructure-client on the root AP, but it works
> great.
>
> Andre.
>
>
> 2014-02-06 Jay Killion (jakillio) <[email protected]>:
>
>>  No, I just used "station-role workgroup-bridge" configured.  But you
>> make a great point, it's good to try the different options together to find
>> out what breaks what.
>>
>>
>>   From: Jason Boyers <[email protected]>
>> Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 8:19 AM
>> To: Jay Killion <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Andre Aubet <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
>> <[email protected]>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Autonomous - Reliability
>>
>>   On the WGB, do you have "station-role workgroup-bridge multicast mode
>> client" configured?  That is incompatible with the "infrastructure client"
>> command on the root side.  I found it helpful to go through the different
>> combinations ("station-role workgroup-bridge" with and without the various
>> multicast mode commands, with and without infrastructure client, and such)
>> to ensure how things will and will not work.  There are some combinations
>> that simply won't pass traffic.
>>
>> Jason Boyers, CCIE #26024 (Wireless)
>> Blog: netboyers.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jay Killion (jakillio) <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hey Andre -
>>>
>>>  Yes, the full requirement was, "Ensure that the association reliable.
>>> So the AP disassociates clients only many packets are lost. Use the maximum
>>> reliable setting for the association to stay up.".  Given that the word
>>> "reliable" and "reliability" are used 7 times in the CCO WGB documentation
>>> and *every single one* of them are in the section on "infrastructure
>>> client", I interpreted the requirement as wanting both "packet retries" and
>>> "infrastructure client".  But anyways...
>>>
>>>  Yes, I was using both "auth open" and "auth eap" for the SSID.  The
>>> WGB would associate and authenticate every time without any issue, even
>>> after rebooting both sides.  The instant I removed "infrastructure client"
>>> from the root side, without any further changes, the WGB side immediately
>>> received DHCP and pings started working.
>>>
>>>  I'm still not sure why it wouldn't work with "infrastructure client",
>>> but good to know for the future.
>>>
>>>
>>>   From: Andre Aubet <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 1:50 AM
>>> To: Jay Killion <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Wireless] Autonomous - Reliability
>>>
>>>   Hi Jay,
>>>
>>>  You really met an interesting behavior here!!!
>>>
>>>  I just read the complete lab requirement, it says:
>>>  Ensure that the association reliable. So the AP disassociates clients
>>> only many packets are lost. Use the maximum reliable setting for the
>>> association to stay up.
>>>
>>>  For this, I would have used the packet retries command I think. It
>>> allows the client entry to be removed only after a specified number of
>>> missed 802.11 packets (maximum being 127 I think).
>>>
>>>  About the infrastructure client, what it actually does:
>>>
>>>    - sends a first time the multicast/broadcast frame, and re-send it
>>>    in an encapsulated unicast frame to the WGB. It allows the frame to be
>>>    acknowledged by the WGB.
>>>    - allows the WGB, which is normally treated as a wireless client, to
>>>    associate to an infrastructure only AP
>>>
>>> In your configuration, this is weird the WGB can't get an IP address.
>>> You say the association works fine, but the DHCP Discover isn't received by
>>> the DHCP server. If it didn't work with a static IP address, I would think
>>> something is missing in your configuration.
>>>
>>>  By any chance, were you using the authentication network-eap method to
>>> associate, or only authentication open eap. I think network-eap (Cisco
>>> proprietary) is a requirement when using an infrastructure mode.
>>>
>>>  Andre.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-06 Jay Killion (jakillio) <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>>  Hi all -
>>>>
>>>>  I'm working on WB2 lab 3 and the following requirement was given for
>>>> an autonomous WGB, "Ensure that the association is reliable."  I thought
>>>> the question was looking for me to configure "infrastructure client" on the
>>>> root AP since CCO documentation says to do this for "increased
>>>> reliability".  Turns out that wasn't what the lab was looking for, but it
>>>> did bring up an interesting result - no DHCP even though the WGB associated
>>>> without any issue.
>>>>
>>>>  The other requirement for this task was to have the WGB receive it's
>>>> IP address via DHCP.  I couldn't for the life of me figure out why DHCP
>>>> wasn't working, as my debugs showed the AP sending them but never getting a
>>>> reply (or being seen by the DHCP server).  Even if I configured a static IP
>>>> address for the BVI, pings still wouldn't work.
>>>>
>>>>  I finally looked at the answer to see what I was missing and noticed
>>>> IPX didn't use "infrastructure client" as part of their solution.  I
>>>> removed that piece and everything immediately started working.  I've read
>>>> what "infrastructure client" does - reliably deliver multicast and ARP's,
>>>> but I don't see why this broke the ping / DHCP from the WGB.
>>>>
>>>>  Any insight?
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks
>>>> Jay Killion, CCIE #17873 R/S
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>>
>>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::
>>>
>>> iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Reply via email to