*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Are we going to miss anything by having used g77-3.3 rather than gfortran installing ccp4-6.0? We built it simply by ./configure linux && make && make install there were no obvious error messages --- since as far as I understand the mac-intels are no new architecture, should gcc-3.x not build even with the new macs? If so, I do not understand all the trouble people seem to have installing ccp4-6.0, and I am worried we might miss anything pretty or precious by not using gfortran!? -- Tim Gruene Institut fuer anorganische Chemie Tammannstr. 4 D-37077 Goettingen GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Charles Ballard wrote: > *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** > *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk *** > > > Hi Bill, > > slow but steady progress on CCP4 on os x. I have got it about as far > as the ppc version when compiling using 4.1 . Major problem is that > gfortran uses a linux header for setting up the floating point > exceptions, I have a work around and will be in contact with the > gfortran people as soon as I can figure out how (the gsl folk where > much easier to get in contact with). > > In short, with some tickling CCP4 will compile on a mactel box. > > Charles Ballard > CCP4 > > On Monday, March 6, 2006, at 05:03 PM, William Scott wrote: > > > > >> Hi Bill > >> > >> Still, this is better than gfortran on an intel Mac. Every code that > >> uses a maths function fails at runtime with an EXC_ARITHMETIC, > >> including the gcc testsuite math.f90 . gcc/g++ seem to work nicely > >> though. > >> > >> Charles > > > > Dear Charles: > > > > Thanks. You just saved me $1200 and doubtless a five-star migrane. > > > > Bill > > > > >
