*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
The map they will get may or may not bear much resemblance to one's own
experimental map, depending on whether they used the same programs with
the same parameters - e.g. I'm not sure that everyone wants to install
and learn how to use SHARP just to look at an experimental electron
density map from deposited data. Perhaps before we get to the point of
mandating the deposition of structure factors (something I support), we
should get the problem of accepting phases fixed ? It would seem to be
both the easiest and most appropriate solution.
Phil Jeffrey
Mark J. van Raaij wrote:
what you can do (I did this for our last two structures) is send them
multiple datasets, for instance the different derivative datasets or MAD
wavelength datasets, then users of the pdb can calculate their own phases.
Mark
>
On 15 Dec 2006, at 16:05, William Scott wrote:
I've tried to give them phases. They won't take them. I think it would
be really helpful to have the experimental map (or a composite-omit map in
the case of MR). I don't think there is a way of representing the latter
as phases, so the option to submit phases and/or map should be available.
