*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
I've tried to give them phases. They won't take them. I think it would be really helpful to have the experimental map (or a composite-omit map in the case of MR). I don't think there is a way of representing the latter as phases, so the option to submit phases and/or map should be available. Peter Adrian Meyer wrote: > *** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the *** > *** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk *** > > >> I agree that more information to referees is desirable, & I've often > wanted to see the coordinates and the structure factors to check things. > But to follow up after publication, there are still a lot of structures > deposited without structure factors - why is deposition of structure > factors not compulsory? And who can change things so that > > This is probably an idiot newbie question, but the vast majority of > structures I've seen in the PDB w\ "structure factors" only have > amplitudes. Granted, you could calculate phases from the model; but > shouldn't a structure factor be a complex number instead of a real number? > > I'd think there should be the experimental phases, or at least model > phases with the weighting scheme the authors used for their final maps for > it to be called a structure factor...but evidentally I'm wrong. > > > Pete > > > Pete Meyer > Fu Lab > BMCB grad student > Cornell University > > > >
