As long as I have been using the ccp4i (which has been a couple of years 
now), this magic button has been there, and it has even been in the 'lower 
left corner': When you hold your mouse button on the "Run" button, a submenu 
appears, the second item of which is saying "Run&View com file". This opens 
an editable window with the script used to run the ccp4-program.

This, by the way, is very handy for setting the matrix weight in Refmac5 to 
'auto', as recommended by the authors of ARP/wARP.

Tim


-----Original Message-----

From: Roger Rowlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: [email protected]

Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:44:13 -0400

Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4 GUI




I think a "tweak script" button or option (before running) would be an 
excellent idea.



Cheers,



___________________________________________

Roger S. Rowlett

Professor

Department of Chemistry

Colgate University

13 Oak Drive

Hamilton, NY 13346



tel: (315)-228-7245

ofc: (315)-228-7395

fax: (315)-228-7935

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-----Original Message-----

From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Juergen Bosch

Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:40 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4 GUI





Hi Martyn,



how about option c:



in each gui window at the lower left corner have a button called 

"Display script", or call it "Expert Mode" if people feel better as 

"Experts" :-) , before running of course. Then people who would like to 

edit their stuff could do so before running the script. I think it would 

be scary to many if the "Expert Mode" actually would display all other 

options available for that particular program - for this you have the RTFM*



I tend to use the GUI only for standard stuff and keep migrating my 

scripts from directories to directories, which if you run a search on 

say e.g. "refmac." spits out a ton of handcrafted scripts for each 

project - maybe also not the best thing to do, but that's how it is.



Juergen



* Fine of course, what else !



Martyn Winn wrote:



>This is timely. We're in the process of a) trying to organise a major 

>effort to tidy up the existing ccp4i classic (rather than fire-fighting 

>problems), and b) thinking about designing the next generation. Not 

>sure which this is. Option b) would be a project over several years.

>

>Can you elucidate further. As an expert user, would you want a less 

>scary free text box (which is essentially what Run&View Com File is), 

>or actual widgets for every option. The latter could be done as a 

>hidden folder, made visible according to an Expert switch in 

>Preferences.

>

>As developers, we also have to think about long-term maintainability. 

>Options, in particular little-used options, can soon become 

>out-of-date.

>

>m

>

>

>On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 12:41 +0200, Miguel Ortiz Lombardia wrote:

>  

>

>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>Hash: SHA1

>>

>>Dear all,

>>

>>I'm a well-known luddite as Eleanor says. However, I shamelessly 

>>confess that the CCP4 GUI is great. Not that I think this is necessary 

>>here, I'm sure most people agree with that.

>>

>>If I write now is because Martynn's e-mail have reminded me of 

>>something I thought once, but forgot to ask for to the ccp4i 

>>developpers: perhaps the GUI could have "two faces/modes", a basic one 

>>and an expert/advanced one. I understand that they already exist, but 

>>the "expert" one is hidden under the "Run&View Com File", while I'm 

>>thinking on a real expert GUI-mode. Users should be able to choose one 

>>or the other in their defaults, or switch from one to the other 

>>on-the-fly.

>>

>>I don't have a particular problem in editing the scripts as it is done 

>>now, but I have found that students tend to get a bit nervous about 

>>doing it themselves ;-)

>>

>>Cheers,

>>

>>

>>Miguel

>>

>>Martyn Winn escribió:

>>    

>>

>>>The level of detail in the GUI is a matter of constant debate. The 

>>>underlying programs are far far richer, so the question is how much 

>>>to expose in the GUI. We try to get a balance between ease-of-use and 

>>>coverage, but it won't always work. BTW I don't think we ever claimed 

>>>that ccp4i (or anything else in ccp4) is "finished" ;-)

>>>

>>>Having said that, we're always happy to hear about specific defects 

>>>in the GUI. When reporting these to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please give as much 

>>>information as possible, in particular knowing the context is always 

>>>helpful.

>>>

>>>Cheers

>>>Martyn

>>>      

>>>

>

>

>  

>





-- 

Jürgen Bosch

University of Washington

Dept. of Biochemistry, K-426

1705 NE Pacific Street

Seattle, WA 98195

Box 357742

Phone:     +1-206-616-4510

FAX:    +1-206-685-7002

Reply via email to