I fully agree with Dale in not understanding what the problem is. Perhaps I
have a better chance if you clearly explain what exactly you mean by "is
there any way to better the B factors".
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Dale Tronrud <de...@daletronrud.com>
> I'm sorry but I don't understand what your problem is. Do you think
> the B factors are too small for a 3A data set? A range of 70 to 75 is a
> little smaller than usual but probably not out of bounds.
> Dale Tronrud
> On 10/12/2016 7:59 PM, sunanda williams wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have a structure at 3.0 A and R/Rfree of 24/28. The mean B value is
> > around 98. The B value is especially high at the N terminus and two loop
> > regions (around 120-150 AA).
> > The rest of the structure averaged around 70-75. Has anyone faced such a
> > scenario? How reliable is the structure and is there any way to better
> > the B factors.
> > Any help is appreciated.
> > Thank you!!