I see by historical records that IBM patented the 8" floppy disk in 1972. It produced and released the disk in 1971. Was there a reason for this?
Happy computing. Murray 🙂 On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 2:25 PM Tom Gardner via cctalk < [email protected]> wrote: > All true, but the question remains of when did the first 23FD did ship? > Apparently the 2880 Block Multiplexor Channel along with the 2835/2305 were > announced on February 10, 1970 for both the S/360 M85 and M195. > > There are reliable sources that a 23FD did ship in January 1971 either in > the M155 or in a 2835/2305; perhaps simultaneously to the same location. > > It could have shipped in a 2835/2305 for a S/360 M85 before January 1971 > on a 2880 Block Multiplexor Channel but so far I can't find any information > either way. > > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: > Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2026 6:39 PM > To: Jon Elson via cctalk <[email protected]> > Subject: [cctalk] Re: Floppy disk > > The 360/85 had the microcode for its base instruction set in ROS (ROM) so > it would not have needed a device like the 23FD to get started. It was > also shipped starting in December 1969 which is before the date the 23FD is > reputed to have been ready. A paper I found at > https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/1476936.1476969 describes > instructions in the the 360/85 to load words into the writeable control > store from main memory. The 370 systems on the other hand had no control > store in ROS so needed a device to do the Initial Microcode Load > (IML) to get the machine of the ground and I suspect the 23FD and later > IML microcode sources where just part of the IML system as something would > have to stuff the microcode into the control store. I see some > 370 documents mention a "Service Processor" that loads the microcode, one > candidate for this service processor would be one of the family of > Universal Controllers that IBM used in a wide variety of machines dating > back to the early to mid 1970s. > > Paul. > > On 2026-06-09 20:21, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote: > > On 6/9/26 16:24, Tom Gardner via cctalk wrote: > >> Lot's of mis-information which I think I correct below > >> > >> I'm pretty sure the first shipments of the 23FD was in January 1971 > >> the with 2835 Storage Control Unit for the 2305 Fixed Head DASD and > >> the S/370 M155; it might have been simultaneous but the 2835 did > >> attach to existing S/360 M85 2880 Block Multiplexer channel and the > >> M85 shipped in December 1969. It was followed later that year with > >> the shipment in the S/370 M165 and then the rest of the S/370. FWIW, > >> the 2835 SCU was very similar to the 3380 SCU, mainly differing due > >> to the parallel data transfer from the drive. The 23FD was a read > >> only device > > > > The 360/85 was EXTREMELY close to the 370/165, in fact it was the > > prototype of the 165. Looking through principles of operation from > > the two models shows instruction timings are totally identical. The > > model 165 had a 23FD to load microcode and diagnostics. The 360/85 > > had read-only 360 microcode, but emulators and diagnostics were > > loadable. I can only assume that was done via a 23FD. The major > > difference between 360/85 and 370/165 hardware was that microcode was > > partially read-only in the 85, with 500 words or writeable control > > store, implemented in 16-bit MST4 chips. The 165 had all microcode in > > writable ECL static RAM in 64-bit chips. The /85 cache (storage > > buffer) was implemented in the same 16-bit chip technology, the 165 > > was done with the 64-bit chips. There were some slight differences in > > the 360 vs. 370 processor status word, also. > > > > Jon > > > > > >
