The strange thing is, I dont really have an
opinion about what should happen to all of the kids that would be born if
abortions were prohibited. But that is really a moot point, because it's a
seperate issue I guess.

I guess it is a separate issue, because inclusion would make people think when
taking radical and controlling positions.

All morality aside, If there were no genetically defective, or even unwanted
children born, the effect on the economy would be tremendous.  Think of
reduction of the expense of welfare, reduction in prison population,  reduction
in family medial costs, lower taxes and higher disposable income for all that
remain.  Society would have fewer people to ostracize, and despise.  Church
pastors could concentrate on delivering the gospel instead of fanatic moral
positions.

What makes a fetus viable as a child was defined way back in history, before
extra-ordinary medical intervention was available.   Thus a fetus became a
person only after live birth and it started breathing on its own.  before that
occurrence it was not a child, but a potential child defined as a fetus.

Also different cultures approach the matter quite differently, for instance
since the mainstream Chinese cannot afford expensive drugs, surgeries, or birth
control devices or drugs, they developed herbal remedies, acupuncture and other
methodologies to prevent or relieve suffering.  Before someone chimes in here
and talks about fetal death rate bear in mind that the US has the highest or
near the highest death rate on the planet.  As population has become so
outrageous, drastic measures have been put in place, restricting the number of
children a couple may have, and even more drastic, requiring doctors to kill
female babies as they are born, where abortions are not an option.   This alone
is a big reason so many natives of that country yearn to emigrate to other
countries.

Sure there is adoption, but that institution is not only widely criticized, but
is just not available for all the unwanted children being born, raised in foster
care and graduating to welfare, only to start the cycle all over again, or the
unthinkable alternative, spending much of their lives at taxpayer expense in
prison.

There are big financial incentives to a few to continue their fanaticism, but
there are even larger, but less specific financial incentives in taking the
burden off of society's back.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to