A pregnant woman who doesnt' want a child is NOT a mother, unless she has prior children.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: John Stanley
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:31 AM
  Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion

  Sorry, was playing paintball and then had hockey last night so was in no
  shape to type till this morning.

  Yup.

  Here's the kicker. I understand the arguments the pro-choice people have,
  and even at some level agree with most of the issues raised, but I cant get
  around the simple fact that a mother is someone who only wants to protect
  and nurture their child, not have them vacuumed out.

  >>What, in your opinion, should happen post-viability if the mother wants an
  abortion or wants to do something that poses a risk to the baby?
  >>Chemotherapy let's say? Or sky-diving? Enlistment? Driving a car?

  If she wants an abortion, she cant have one. If she participates in a
  dangerous event and harms the baby then I think she should face the music.
  Chemo is different and any harm to the baby is a direct result of medical
  treatment and not due to negligence.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 2:32 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: Conversation Topic - Abortion

  He's an agnostic. Viability is a reasonable place to draw a line, if you
  want my opinion. You could quarrel with this if so inclined, but let's not.
  What, in your opinion, should happen post-viability if the mother wants an
  abortion or wants to do something that poses a risk to the baby?
  Chemotherapy let's say? Or sky-diving? Enlistment? Driving a car?

  Feel free to jump in here, John :)

  Dana

  > And John, do you have a religion?
  > To me its common sense that a fetus that lives inside its mother and
  > cannot live outside is NOT a baby.
   
  > ----- Original Message -----
   
  > From: John Stanley
   
  > To: CF-Community
   
  > Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 3:48 PM
   
  > Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
  >
  >
   
  > >>Dana, calling "abortion" "murdering our children" is a religious
   
  > > concept, imo, not common sensical.  A fetus is not a "child".
  >
   
  > I believe I said it was murdering children. This is not a religious
  > concept
   
  > to me. It IS common sense. If you are pregnant and you choose to end
  > the
   
  > pregnancy by abortion, then you are murdering your child. To me, life
  > begins
   
  > upon conception. There is also a double standard here, when some
  > people
   
  > argue for abortion, they claim that the fetus is not a child, but then
  > when
   
  > they get the news that their sister/cousin/friend just had a
  > miscarriage,
   
  > they rush over to confort them when they lost their baby. If it's not
  > a
   
  > baby, you should tell them on the phone, "hey, toughen up. It's not a
  > baby,
   
  > it's just a collection of cells" yeah, right.
    _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to