>>and ignore another - if somebody accidentally dies somebody under the
>>care of another, it's manslaughter, and since the unborn fetus is "under
>>the care" of the mother, then that should be manslaughter as well
Phillip, all I am saying is that I think if a person goes to a clinic, witch
doctor, or back alley hack and has their baby removed then it is murder to
me.
All the other cases, to me fall into another category.
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 9:16 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
> From: John Stanley
>
> >>If you follow this logic through - if a woman has a
> miscarriage or a
> >>still birth, then they are responsible for the "death" of
> that child,
> >>maybe even directly
>
> No, if they terminate their pregnancy by direct physical
> action then they are responsible, but a miscarriage or still
> birth is obviously different.
So you're saying that an accidental death is different from murder, but
only in the instances of when the child hasn't been born?
You can't "use" one aspect of the law (saying that abortion is murder)
and ignore another - if somebody accidentally dies somebody under the
care of another, it's manslaughter, and since the unborn fetus is "under
the care" of the mother, then that should be manslaughter as well
I don't see the difference if you're using murder for abortion
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
