at people walking into the right to life group offices or mailing plastic
fetuses to members of congress. Or breaking into these offices and spraying
them with gunfire or firebombing them?
Moral equivalency?
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 3:13 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
>
>
> >> You're saying that if I say I support a woman's right to choose, it
> imposes a moral viewpoint on an anti abortion supporter.
>
> Isnt it true that any stance in a debate about something
> imposes a viewpoint upon everyone else in that discussion?
> That is all I am referring to, not forcing anyone to do anything.
>
> >> while the anti-abortion group wants and does interfere with others.
>
> Agreed. But that is only a portion of the anti crowd that
> acts that way. There are just as many supporters of ab-rights
> that demonstrate as well.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 2:56 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
>
>
> John,
>
> I have some difficulty following your logic here. You're
> saying that if I say I support a woman's right to choose, it
> imposes a moral viewpoint on an anti abortion supporter. How
> so, I'm not forcing her to have an abortion. I am expressing
> my viewpoint only, not strapping her to a table and
> performing a D & C. In contrast the efforts of anti abortion
> supporters DO impose their moral viewpoint on those with whom
> they disagree. There is a difference here.
>
> One way of looking at it is one group wants simply to be left
> alone as they go through a difficult time while the
> anti-abortion group wants and does interfere with others.
>
> larry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 2:35 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
> >
> >
> > >Just as supporting abortion rights is imposing different
> > moral views on
> > >others.
> > >> no. If I get pregnant tomorrow nobody is going to tell me
> > I *have* to
> > have an abortion. You on the other hand seem to feel it would
> > be ok if I
> > *had* to have the baby.
> >
> > Yes (to your "no"). Expressing support for a womans right to
> > choose is imposing radically different moral views than the
> > pro-lifers own stances. I'm not telling you or anyone you
> > have to have your babies, I AM saying if you choose to have
> > an abortion that is medically unwarranted than I think you
> > have killed/murdered your child.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 2:19 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Conversation Topic - Abortion
> >
> >
> > no. If I get pregnant tomorrow nobody is going to tell me I
> > *have* to have an abortion. You on the other hand seem to
> > feel it would be ok if I *had* to have the baby.
> >
> > Dana
> >
> > >>> However, condoning abortion as murder, as some have done on this
> > >>> thread,
> > >is imposing moral views on others.
> > >
> > >Just as supporting abortion rights is imposing different
> > moral views on
> > >others.
> > _____
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _____
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
