together and using free association to reach some astounding conclusion
:
Conspiracy Theory.
Because the single facts that Michael Moore puts forward may be
unassailable, that does not mean his conclusions whether implied or
explicit, are correct.
Moore himself has said on a few talkshows since the movie (saw him on
Conan) that he may be wrong, and what he says isn't necessarily true,
it's just his opinion.
Like I said before, the danger is in people believing his conclusions
absolutely instead of analysing the 'facts' presented in the movie and
what they really mean themselves.
Similar to the danger in taking the Bush Administration at face value
with their rhetoric for launching the war in Iraq.
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 2:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Fahrenheit 9/11
Moore never claimed anything but an op-ed but no one has been able to
refute his facts,
even though they are emphasized Some can claim that not all the
facts were presented only those favorable to the view of Michael
Moore, but isn't that how the prosecution presents its case to a jury?
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
