> At 11:51 AM 7/1/04, Monique wrote:
> >Ok so it took a few month for them to plan 911
> >I sure it was in progress way before Bush took
> office.
>
> Bush was in office for 9 months before 9/11. He
> spent 42% of that time on
> vacation, and a lot of rest of that time dealing
> with the fallout from his
> good buddy Ken Lay's Enron debacle, and buying votes
> with his tax cut.
All nonsence.
Bush was off 13%. Moore counted the time he spent at
Camp David as vacation time. It was not.
Enron was Clintons mess. Bush declined to help Enon
remember?
I enjoyed my tax refund thanks.
>He
> spent no time the terrorist threat, in spite of
> being warned by the
> outgoing president that it was the number one issue.
> Regardless of when
> it was planned, it happened on Bush's watch. He
> doesn't get to take credit
> for the good stuff, and blame the bad stuff on
> Clinton.
Clinton let Osama go. Remember? He denied it but we
know he's a cronic lier so why do you listen to him.
He just said under oath he didn't let Bin Laden get
away. Yet he was caught on video in LI telling people
he let him go because he didn't have enough to charge
him on. I blame Clinton and I think today Cheney did
also. :)
>
Speaking of the lsot surplus:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1272/is_2648_127/ai_54680884
The Clinton illusions begin with the alleged surpluses
for this fiscal year and the next. In reality, they do
not exist. They all come from the Social Security
fund. This is important because the Treasury cannot
use the Social Security surplus to pay down the
national debt. Those funds, invested in U.S. bonds and
held in trust, must be redeemed eventually to meet
future Social Security obligations.
If the current Social Security surplus is subtracted
from Clinton's budget, the Federal government actually
will be running a $42,000,000,000 deficit in Fiscal
Year 1999 and a $12,000,000,000 deficit in FY 2000.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) does not
project a significant government surplus (minus the
Social Security funds) until FY 2002, and these OMB
projections, as the nation has learned from painful
experience, can be widely off the mark. The
Congressional Budget Office, which generally makes
more cautious predictions, has warned that OMB's
projected non-Social Security surplus of
$188,000,000,000 for FY 2009 could be as much as
$300,000,000,000 in error.
-sm
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
