killfile
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 4:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: What if?
Sorry, I forgot my quote.
"We have an entire political party which is engaged in
an effort to make sure we lose this war so that they
win the White House, and I am not mincing words. They
are doing everything they can to see that our effort
to win this is defeated, because it's Bush leading
it." -Rush
--- Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 11:51 AM 7/1/04, Monique wrote:
> > >Ok so it took a few month for them to plan 911
> > >I sure it was in progress way before Bush took
> > office.
> >
> > Bush was in office for 9 months before 9/11. He
> > spent 42% of that time on
> > vacation, and a lot of rest of that time dealing
> > with the fallout from his
> > good buddy Ken Lay's Enron debacle, and buying
> votes
> > with his tax cut.
> All nonsence.
> Bush was off 13%. Moore counted the time he spent at
> Camp David as vacation time. It was not.
> Enron was Clintons mess. Bush declined to help Enon
> remember?
> I enjoyed my tax refund thanks.
>
> >He
> > spent no time the terrorist threat, in spite of
> > being warned by the
> > outgoing president that it was the number one
> issue.
> > Regardless of when
> > it was planned, it happened on Bush's watch. He
> > doesn't get to take credit
> > for the good stuff, and blame the bad stuff on
> > Clinton.
> Clinton let Osama go. Remember? He denied it but we
> know he's a cronic lier so why do you listen to him.
> He just said under oath he didn't let Bin Laden get
> away. Yet he was caught on video in LI telling
> people
> he let him go because he didn't have enough to
> charge
> him on. I blame Clinton and I think today Cheney did
> also. :)
>
> >
> Speaking of the lsot surplus:
>
>
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1272/is_2648_127/ai_54680884
>
> The Clinton illusions begin with the alleged
> surpluses
> for this fiscal year and the next. In reality, they
> do
> not exist. They all come from the Social Security
> fund. This is important because the Treasury cannot
> use the Social Security surplus to pay down the
> national debt. Those funds, invested in U.S. bonds
> and
> held in trust, must be redeemed eventually to meet
> future Social Security obligations.
>
> If the current Social Security surplus is subtracted
> from Clinton's budget, the Federal government
> actually
> will be running a $42,000,000,000 deficit in Fiscal
> Year 1999 and a $12,000,000,000 deficit in FY 2000.
> The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) does not
> project a significant government surplus (minus the
> Social Security funds) until FY 2002, and these OMB
> projections, as the nation has learned from painful
> experience, can be widely off the mark. The
> Congressional Budget Office, which generally makes
> more cautious predictions, has warned that OMB's
> projected non-Social Security surplus of
> $188,000,000,000 for FY 2009 could be as much as
> $300,000,000,000 in error.
>
> -sm
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
