I think the whole "we support our troops" motto came out of the horror
stories about traumatized vets coming back from Vietnam only to be
spit on and called baby killers. It is however a step from not wanting
to go there to not wanting to question anything to government does
ever.

I consider my mind to be still mostly open on the topic, but really, I
have to question the war on Iraq. If it needed to be done then it
should have been done differently. I went on a book-buying binge over
the weekend and picked up Bob Woodward's Plan of Attack. I understand
that the book relies heavily on Colin Powell's point of view; we'll
see if it changes my mind about anything. So far (around page 100) I
see an administration that was just bound and determined to go to war
regardless of the consequences.

Dana
  
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:37:47 -0400, Nick McClure
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is interesting way to look at it, however I feel that protesting the
> merits of war makes it very difficult to support the troops.
>
> Think of it this way, how is it on Morale if you protest the war by saying
> we shouldn't be there, how does that affect the minds of the troops who are
> there when you say they shouldn't be there, that what they are doing is
> wrong.
>
> You may support them mentally, and hope they do their job well and make it
> back safe and all that, but if you don't think they should be there, and
> that what they are fighting for is wrong, then you aren't really supporting
> the troops, you are telling them what they are doing is wrong, and that hits
> the morale.
>
> Just my opinion, I don't know how others see this.
>
>   _____  
>
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:05 PM
> To: CF-Community
>
>
> Subject: Re: 9/11 Commission to Cheney - You're still wrong.
>
> well it's an argument over the definition of "pressure." No, the Bush
> administration did not hold a gun to anyone's head. Still. The
> available choices were portrayed at the time as "support our troops"
> or...not. Yes, lawmakers should have shown more gumption and it is
> troubling that they did not. But they did not and can you blame them?
> I thought twice before standing on the sidelines of an antiwar
> protest. And wisely; the protest was teargassed on one of the nights I
> was not there. It's very easy to second-guess a CIA analyst with a
> mortgage and two children in college.
>
> Dana________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to