WHAT? :)


same-sex marriage conversation to second-hand fat and hillary clinton.


I am on a sugar low, so I am not following that at all.

-----Original Message-----
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 3:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage

> So where exactly is the line drawn?  Where do we consider
> religious values
> to form the basis of our legal system?  Jeeze,
> homosexuality isn't even that
> important topic in religion: it didn't make the top ten or
> the seven deadly.

Yea, when you read the passage in the King James (butchered all to
hell as it is), God seems to have some interesting priorities. Right
next to "thou shalt not kill" there seems to be a fair amount of
information about how to cook. Maybe he was getting house-keeping tips
from Martha Stewart. :)

> So shouldn't the religious movement be more concerned
> about what God Himself
> was concerned with?  Shouldn't, using His own priorities,
> all that righteous
> energy be directed towards a "no coveting" amendment or
> some solid "no
> gluttony" legislation?

Did you never hear about the campaign to "fight the fat" in america
started by ... Hillary Clinton I believe... -- now there's another
woman who's done some seriously evil things... as a direct result of
her actions, child-protective services agents (an agency that gets a
new name every so many years because they can't keep it from being
corrupted), receive literal monetary bonuses for each child taken out
of the home. Or they did for a while -- I haven't been following the
law recently, but it was one of the most genuinely evil things I've
ever read -- and yet almost no-one knows about it.

But I digress -- Hillary wanted to "fight the fat" in america with the
help of the then former surgeon general (the guy who'd taken over for
him apparently didn't approve). Rush limbaugh had a big schpiel about
it on his tv show (after his web-site to sell neck-ties completely
tanked the NYC phone system for 3 hrs but well before his show got
cancelled and we discovered that he's a junkie), "I can see it now,
there'll be caps at McDonalds and people will be talking about 'second
hand fat'." ... Probably that's a good deal of what inspired all the
nonsense about people sueing McDonalds for making them fat and trying
to make it out like it's comparable to the tobacco industry marketing
a product they know to be deadly toxic to children.

s. isaac dealey   954.927.5117

new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to