-- not really related to the original topic. ;)
These aren't the comments you're looking for.
Move along. :)
> WHAT? :)
> same-sex marriage conversation to second-hand fat and
> hillary clinton.
> I am on a sugar low, so I am not following that at all.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 3:02 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
>> So where exactly is the line drawn? Where do we consider
>> religious values
>> to form the basis of our legal system? Jeeze,
>> homosexuality isn't even that
>> important topic in religion: it didn't make the top ten
>> or
>> the seven deadly.
> Yea, when you read the passage in the King James
> (butchered all to
> hell as it is), God seems to have some interesting
> priorities. Right
> next to "thou shalt not kill" there seems to be a fair
> amount of
> information about how to cook. Maybe he was getting
> house-keeping tips
> from Martha Stewart. :)
>> So shouldn't the religious movement be more concerned
>> about what God Himself
>> was concerned with? Shouldn't, using His own priorities,
>> all that righteous
>> energy be directed towards a "no coveting" amendment or
>> some solid "no
>> gluttony" legislation?
> Did you never hear about the campaign to "fight the fat"
> in america
> started by ... Hillary Clinton I believe... -- now there's
> another
> woman who's done some seriously evil things... as a direct
> result of
> her actions, child-protective services agents (an agency
> that gets a
> new name every so many years because they can't keep it
> from being
> corrupted), receive literal monetary bonuses for each
> child taken out
> of the home. Or they did for a while -- I haven't been
> following the
> law recently, but it was one of the most genuinely evil
> things I've
> ever read -- and yet almost no-one knows about it.
> But I digress -- Hillary wanted to "fight the fat" in
> america with the
> help of the then former surgeon general (the guy who'd
> taken over for
> him apparently didn't approve). Rush limbaugh had a big
> schpiel about
> it on his tv show (after his web-site to sell neck-ties
> completely
> tanked the NYC phone system for 3 hrs but well before his
> show got
> cancelled and we discovered that he's a junkie), "I can
> see it now,
> there'll be caps at McDonalds and people will be talking
> about 'second
> hand fat'." ... Probably that's a good deal of what
> inspired all the
> nonsense about people sueing McDonalds for making them fat
> and trying
> to make it out like it's comparable to the tobacco
> industry marketing
> a product they know to be deadly toxic to children.
> s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
> _____
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
