this up. Most homosexuality is not. In my opinion. I do understand
that you are saying that homosexuality makes your skin crawl in the
same way incest does mine. I personally do not think this is terribly
logical, but I guess you aren't claiming that it is. Which is fine,
until we start amending the Constitution over it.
In general I personally am against laws regulating the sexual behavior
of adults with other adults. There will of course be exceptions such
as rape or deliberate infection with AIDS.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:55:37 -0400
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the argument was some people view homosexuality wrong just as some view
incest wrong.
(while others view both right)
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:51 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
I don't like it much but I would assume that a 22 year old being an
adult can speak for herself. You have to. It's like abused wives --
you can't rescue them, they have to leave for themselves.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:17:46 -0400
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You're assuming that the "child" is very young and non-consenting.
In that case, of course it has a victim.
If the father is with his 22 year old daughter then it's ok?
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 3:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
How can it possibly be "for the same reasons" ? Incest has a victim
and a predator. Do you think this is true of homosexuality?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:15:51 -0400
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I look at both issues the same way - wrong.
So the attitude that you have against incest is the same attitude I have
regarding homosexuality for the same reasons.
(I have to leave to take the little guy to a Braves game, so don't think I
am not answering your emails..I just need to leave)
Have a good eve...
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 3:13 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
You're looking at it backwards. Why would any group support incest,
given the known harm that it causes and the almost universal revulsion
it inspires? All morality and compassion aside, it would be an utterly
stupid move from the point of view of public relations.
And more to *my* point, how would gay marriage lead to such a thing?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:29:11 -0400
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is unlawful for a man to sleep with his daughter.
Why would it be surprising that one day a group may want to change this law?
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
Monique
You keep saying this. I see no reason why gay marriage would make it
ok to have sex with children, nor have you supported this assertion.
Dana
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:48:53 -0400, Monique Boea
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where does it stop then?
>
>
> We are going to become a law-less society, so everyone can be happy.
>
>
> If that's where we're going then so be it.
>
>
> I'll still be a conservative, Christian, republican.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 6:59 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
>
> Monique Boea wrote:
> >
> > But if a group of people can change laws (and PLEASE don't compare this
> > to the black human rights issue) then what is to stop other groups from
> > changing the laws to further change marriage, age limits, sex limits,
> > crime, etc. Like a man wanting to marry his daughter. Do we further
> > change the laws to accommodate him? Or a woman who wants to sleep with
a
> > 14 year old.
>
> How do you think we got the current laws?
>
> That's right, we got the current laws because groups of people could
> convince sufficient people to change the existing law to their views. That
> is a continuous proces and has served over hundreds of years to produce
the
> laws that are currently in place.
> Are you seriously suggesting we stop changing law, send the entire
> legislative body home and live with the current laws forever?
>
> Jochem
> _____________________________________
>
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
