Lets see, to defuse a potential major political problem unnamed
administration sources outed a CIA operative.
Next to defuse the most recent problem unnamed administration sources
ruin a very valuable sting operation that already netted several
Al-Queda operatives.
Does anyone detect a pattern here? Whose side are these people on, or
are they more concerned about getting Bush and the Shubbery reelected
than they are about the nation's safety?
Given this sort of effort its amazing that any other intelligence
agency (eg., British, French, Pakastani, Egyptian etc) would trust the
US.
larry
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:33:27 -0500, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is disturbing.
>
> I was particularly taken back by the quote from Senator George Allen:
>
> "In this situation, in my view, they should have kept their mouth shut and just said, 'We have information, trust us.' "
>
> Riiiiiight....like anyone would trust this administration if they said that in the wake of the Iraqi intelligence mess. The Iraq debacle and it's focal point in a campaign to discredit this administration has forced this kind of situation. The right will argue "See what you made us do?", while the left will say "If you hadn't betrayed our confidence, we'd never be here".
>
> Either way, we end up fighting each other instead of the real enemy.
>
> BG
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Stanley
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 12:46 PM
> Subject: Not suprising
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/08/09/terror.wrap/index.html
> <http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/08/09/terror.wrap/index.html>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
