If the gov must provide concrete proof every time it opens it's mouth....its essentially lame-duck.
Oh, and I happen to think that they are, at the moment, most definitely more interested in getting W elected than anything else. But if you think Kerry's camp is any less singularly focused, yer mistaken. Such is politics. (however, Bush's distraction has the potential to be MUCH more harmful than Kerry's, for the obvious reason that he's the sittin prez)
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Not suprising
However it really makes a good case against trusting this administration.
Lets see, to defuse a potential major political problem unnamed
administration sources outed a CIA operative.
Next to defuse the most recent problem unnamed administration sources
ruin a very valuable sting operation that already netted several
Al-Queda operatives.
Does anyone detect a pattern here? Whose side are these people on, or
are they more concerned about getting Bush and the Shubbery reelected
than they are about the nation's safety?
Given this sort of effort its amazing that any other intelligence
agency (eg., British, French, Pakastani, Egyptian etc) would trust the
US.
larry
<snip>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
