advantage. I trust that Kerry would at least see the potential for
harm in this case. Its fairly obvious that Bush and his coop of
chickenhawks do not.
larry
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:09:42 -0500, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are indeed very good reason's for not trusting this administration. Which presents a huge problem that this situation illustrates: An administration cannot effectively govern if it cannot gaurantee the trust of the people.
>
> If the gov must provide concrete proof every time it opens it's mouth....its essentially lame-duck.
>
> Oh, and I happen to think that they are, at the moment, most definitely more interested in getting W elected than anything else. But if you think Kerry's camp is any less singularly focused, yer mistaken. Such is politics. (however, Bush's distraction has the potential to be MUCH more harmful than Kerry's, for the obvious reason that he's the sittin prez)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 1:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Not suprising
>
> However it really makes a good case against trusting this administration.
>
> Lets see, to defuse a potential major political problem unnamed
> administration sources outed a CIA operative.
>
> Next to defuse the most recent problem unnamed administration sources
> ruin a very valuable sting operation that already netted several
> Al-Queda operatives.
>
> Does anyone detect a pattern here? Whose side are these people on, or
> are they more concerned about getting Bush and the Shubbery reelected
> than they are about the nation's safety?
>
> Given this sort of effort its amazing that any other intelligence
> agency (eg., British, French, Pakastani, Egyptian etc) would trust the
> US.
>
> larry
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
